网站管理 辽ICP备10006314号 
Yesterday's "Reference News" an article entitled "Canadian Journal of Indian Air Force Deployment" BrahMos "missile background of the Indian Army offensive towards China strategy" to practice "," This report should be attracted much attention, the force network also have reproduced the article.
"Plus" a text that the reason why China and India have an offensive strategy "to practice", its focus is India's "Brahmos" ground to ground missiles to the Indian Air Force has been equipped with, is said to be the world's first support Air Force ordered large-surface cruise missiles. Indian Air Force which entertain the view that the move revealed significance.
In accordance with the "plus" a paper on the idea of the Sino-Indian War, India used in the border deployment of the front of the Jabara Airport Su-30MKI multi-role fighter to expand to China in depth, the whole Tibet, Qinghai, Gansu, Yunnan and other second-tier airport attack . Subsequently, the Air Force along with the Army while advancing to a range of 300 km of the "Brahmos" cruise missiles against China's major airports, radar stations, air force facilities. "Plus" article added to "the same tactics also apply to the western border between India and Pakistan." The implication is that the Indian way through this combat will be able to achieve the "plus" the text said, "Indian army chief of staff to contact the meeting at the level already in 2009 China put forward at the same time win, two wars for Pakistan requirements "?
"No man material" does not deny that the Indian Air Force made in the years progress, it does not deny that the Indian Air Force combat mode "for the western border of India and Pakistan." But the way this war can not be applied to China will play a big question mark! Not "did not feed people" deliberately "to belittle India, raising China", but the strategy itself in India a big problem there.
India or the Indian Air Force's strategic presence that two of the most fatal problem, one of the "depth" concept is not clear enough, the second is strategic too large and impractical.
What is "deep"? Does India believe that "the forefront of using the border Jabara Airport Su-30MKI deployment of multi-role fighter to expand China-depth, full-Tibet, Qinghai, Gansu, Yunnan and other second-tier airport attack" is a deep blow to the Chinese? Supplemented by 300 km of the "Brahmos" cruise missiles against China's airports and radar facilities will be able to complete the depth of the blow to China? But "no material people," notes Indian use of "Brahmos" is the premise of "Air Force along with the Army while advancing," God, the Indian Army actually want to reach deep into the Chinese! If so, it is estimated the Air Force's airborne early to New Delhi to the occupation!
Single depth from China, China 5,500 km north-south from east to west distance of 5,000 kilometers. The Su-30MKI multi-role fighter with more than 1,500 miles combat radius of view, its coverage of China's total space is about 1 / 3 of the weak. Even with "Brahmos" more than 300 km range, the limit of attacks can be achieved in India is China's entire space of about 1 / 3. But the other way round, if the Chinese or the Soviet -30 F -11 fighter combat radius to the same attacks in India, then the whole territory of India to combat aircraft in China within the scope of the. India say nearly 300 million square kilometers of land area in the world are on the row number, unfortunately geographically close to India in a huge China, India's strategic depth but become a disadvantage relative to China, and born with the disadvantage to not to change!
In fact, India's Su-30MKI with the idea of multi-role fighter to attack China in depth is only a theoretical setting. If the war fighter in India more than 1,500 km into the Chinese territorial airspace without being shot down so early surrender of China altogether good! In fact this year in April China had been the S-300PUM2 air defense missiles, "move" on the plateau. The news was only a few captions, even the "plateau" are not explicitly referred to specifically, but this "plateau" In addition to the Tibetan Plateau who still care? S-300PUM2 anti-aircraft missiles on the plateau may be "more symbolic than practical significance", but red -9 as the representative of China's air defense system, coupled with a large number of F-Series 10,11 and the Soviet fighters, guarding their own Southwest China When the problem is not a party to the sky too, right?
As with the Indian Air Force's "Brahmos" ground to ground missiles in order to attack China in depth that is really "more symbolic than practical significance" of the. Not to mention "Brahmos" China's vast range of land relative to the space seemed a bit small, do not say that the Chinese anti-missile system to intercept effect, China has its own cruise missiles not only to India but also a slight disadvantage upper hand. Recently "by" the exposure of CJ-10 cruise missiles is said to achieve a range of 1,500 km, this range is against the whole of India within the scope of the place. Also in addition to cruise missiles, China's "Second Artillery Corps," the power of a large number of surface-to-do worse than the cruise missiles it?
India hope to "Brahmos" with to the Air Force to "both win" the war against China and Pakistan "did not feed the people" a bit incredible. So powerful are stuck in the United States on Iraq and the quagmire in Afghanistan can not extricate themselves, India actually want to "both win" the war against China and Pakistan. Even if the strength of India's assistance in the United States has been some progress, but does it mean that China and Pakistan, Iraq and Afghanistan with the strength at the same level? ! Indeed, as India is to achieve a victory of which are almost "mission impossible."
Said Pakistan India are very headache to deal with it. Although the Indian diplomatic years both ways, but people of Pakistan do not so now? India thinks some advanced weapons to Pakistan or China, or from the research base has also helped equip. The aircraft, for example, India has considered himself a fighter Su -30 series against Pakistan can do whatever they want, but as the US-Pakistan F-16 fighter aircraft system ah! China has grown since the inquiry is the most advanced F-10, Pakistan is estimated that sooner or later to equipment. Moreover, Pakistan also co-production with China Xiaolong fighters, most recently as saying that China is not a place to buy a few more fighters to help build aircraft manufacturer gave it? Pakistan not to say these words to say to who can listen to listen to it! From this point of view of Pakistan also has the advanced fighters of holding force it, but this is not the contrary, such as India, Pakistan! Pakistan's "progress" virtually offset to a great area of the Indian Air Force made "tremendous" achievement.
If India really go to war with China and Pakistan at the same time, although not say India will be "dead" miserable, but the outcome can be expected. Between this situation under the Pakistan alone if India, then India is bound to go to war with great force to guard against China, and China also have the ability to support Pakistan with India, "Sike." Conversely, if the individual Indian attack on China, Da Buda's win we also said, but rather to keep India on the one hand against the Pakistani troops, on the other hand China can "launch" of Pakistan towards India to the Indian attack into a "two-front war "The abyss. India's short for "both win" strategy for China and Pakistan is too large, too impractical, no different from dreams.
Naive to think that India has "Brahmos" can win everything, it seems unlikely that China has been the "only weapons on the" found in the Indian market. High-sounding words or phrase: China and India has a long history of the country, we must seek peace! In fact, this sentence should be a serious understanding of India is, or misjudged the situation and may have killed himself!
我要评论
最新评论- 暂无已审核评论!