网站管理 辽ICP备10006314号 
Point insider said that China is Shanghai Jiangnan Changxing shipyard built two sixty thousand-ton aircraft carrier is not an American aircraft carrier!
American aircraft carriers in China really need it? I do like the U.S. Nimitz-class 'this backward' traditional carrier China is not required. Lake in the whole country favorable for the traditional military aircraft of the moment, I am sure that will usher in condemning a: Shut up! The carrier you useless idiot. But how many people see clearly whether the traditional model of the aircraft carrier for China's real military reform and the world's future? I think the traditional generation of aircraft carriers at sea, as close to the end of the era of King, even if just launched the latest version of the United States near Nimitz-class aircraft carrier (Bush) is also not change the fact that coming. Today the rapid development in science and technology, ultra long-range, air and space integration of precision guided weapons with each passing day, the traditional carriers as fully exposed sea monster who is about to come true on the aircraft carrier Khrushchev predicted: the sea live coffin. If the Chinese do not have at this moment forward it to follow the trend blindly, ignoring the conditions in pursuit of untimely "military fashion", then the Chinese people will go 'blue' on the road same mistake again, will be in the future The 30-year best time for China's rise in missed opportunities. In the past 80 years, China has missed the era of the traditional carriers, if in this era coming to an end the moment we'll like 'Kua Fu' sunset that will follow in the coming era, when the aircraft carrier was caught off guard and unable to.
Aircraft carrier battle command of the sea is indeed on the distant continent to implement military weapon against the firm, its operational effectiveness is currently no substitute for any other weapons, but no doubt that the invisibility of the traditional carriers too bad in the next war will be very vulnerable to a fatal blow, so it is difficult to achieve carrier's own combat missions. Aircraft carrier construction difficult, complex configuration, maintenance, expensive, non-ordinary strength can have, is that it has become a symbol of the powerful and the wealthy. Legend of China's DF-25 and DF-21C conventional carrier will become the killer, regardless of the actual situation at least from the theory in doubt, we do not know exactly how the experimental results, I think that there is no need to wait for the implementation of naval warfare in the future 'one hit kill' time declared end of an era of traditional carriers. We must now think of is: Chinese people can do the Americans do not understand that? Japan, Germany can not think of such a naval veteran of it? Britain, France and other traditional maritime powers which should be most clearly the weaknesses of traditional carriers, I think they had a rainy day in silence.
China needs a strong navy, but also a strong need for our aircraft carrier fleet to defend the future economic development, but we must take the 'good steel used in the cutting edge', we have to concentrate manpower, material and financial resources to the development of future new aircraft carrier , carrier road with Chinese characteristics, the realization of China's aircraft carrier 'leapfrog' development.
Stealth and can dive is the only way to develop future aircraft carrier, China should the whole nation in this area of research and development force immediately, some people will laugh at me: the traditional carriers are not even water, that you have experience in the development of this future aircraft carrier wow! Nonsense! In fact, we did not make sense of this ridicule, because human history has proved: many national development process is not a continuous succession of careful and gradual process of the development process, all good people has one or more leaps and bounds sub-process, another example: the black African world they do not make a greater contribution to technological development, but they can learn to use modern technology, through an understanding of other races can do the work of the same complex, and even the President, you to discrimination can therefore said to them: you do not have the four great inventions and how to use a computer programmed it? Almost all advanced thinking across the nation have the capability of the Chinese nation is definitely one of the world's best nation, we should and must have such a leap of thinking.
Traditional aircraft carrier of the future may only be the only place that inheritable 'flight deck of the application of technology', China's submarine technology is not far down the West, and I personally think that has been close to, which is China's R & D the future aircraft carrier to lay a solid technical reserves, together with our modern destroyers and patrol boats to stealth design of practical experience I assert that: China has the ability to design a new type of aircraft used in combat and can rapidly.
To put it plainly: the future aircraft carrier is a carrier-based aircraft and missiles built a large submarine, although it does not need modern deep submergence submarine tactics, high-mute, but by a simple dive depth of 100 meters and the surface of the tactical action Stealth the weakness put the traditional command of the aircraft carrier away, so that the long-range cruise missiles and precision-guided weapons, ballistic missiles have lost direction and goals, and coordination, command and tactical submarines, cruisers, destroyers and frigates with its own aircraft carrier and missiles (cruise, ballistic and anti-aircraft missiles) against the enemy launched a fierce sea or land targets hit, air and sea battle, the aircraft carrier itself to play vividly irreplaceable combat effectiveness. Now we have lost and should not be lost to waste on things that our youth should be brainstorming, reuse the younger generation, to the Chinese scientific and technological personnel in the most generous support and patience, not fear of failure and courage to explore. Both absorbing Western technology and experience can get rid of the inherent confinement of Western thinking. Also, I think: The booster mode carrier-based aircraft we can try to take off, rocket technology is our strength, why do we always look at people's 'slip hop and catapult' it? Rocket boosters used on-board fuel tank I see better than use, it can even be the future of carrier-based aircraft carrier directly to the combat zone, but also greatly shorten the takeoff run distance. Use of hybrid (ie, rocket engines and aircraft engine combination) of the carrier-based aircraft will bring more convenience to the Chinese navy, fast and flexible. Step further, if the Chinese can this new load carrier aircraft rocket engine rocket vector technology (similar to satellite orbit rocket engine technology), then China's future carrier-based aircraft also can take off and land vertically. That would be how strong we can imagine! My scientific and technical personnel in China are very confident in the future aircraft carrier research and development will be able to go its own way. The key now we have to get wise and great leader support. Having said that I still have to increase a few wordy, and that is: Do not invest in more traditional carrier up and down, taking 80% of the energy used in the development of future new aircraft carrier, the deck technology can land on the simulation and training will 80% of control level of real combat. China's current situation is not suitable for large-scale construction of conventional aircraft carrier.
First, we have not for the aircraft carrier fleet maneuvers out of display space, so we need to give priority to quickly recover Taiwan, and clean up the South China Sea. These campaigns do not require traditional carrier, China's Second Artillery Corps, Navy and Air Force together with enough strength to see the leader of the operation and determination. Their territories brave victory, the Central should the death in breaking the enemy's determination to defeat an enemy that means and confidence, then courage to take action if the United States, the momentum has won Guam, firm courage to do a good job preparing for heavy fighting, completely smashed the island chain.
Second, the state should fix 'Varyag' basis, it is necessary to build a 6-7 million tonnes of conventional aircraft carrier the next 12-16 years as the Navy used for monitoring the South China Sea, and has accumulated experience in using technology deck . 'Varyag' can not be used as a naval aircraft carrier the formal, it is for me the current value of the missile, and naval and air force as a "sink the aircraft carrier" of the target ship training, special training of our army in the present complex conditions of war training in how to destroy aircraft carrier ship (of course, necessary to combat training with live ammunition, bombs can coach.), in the Varyag to be installed on a dynamic and informal, or test the radar and anti-missile weapons, anti-submarine and electromagnetic, electronic jamming system to complete the simulation of real naval aircraft carrier status, to temper our efforts to combat and overcome all kinds of weapons, aircraft carriers, make full preparations for the win, which is Varyag turning waste into the core values. On the Varyag is necessary to train our pilots, but I think this is only its second level of value, certainly China's future than the deck of aircraft carrier Varyag more advanced, it can not completely rely on Varyag to train our pilots. Through these efforts, on the surface we are a luxury, but the actual recovery of Taiwan it for us to clean up the South China Sea, smashed the island chain to save a lot of money to improve the combat level, to avoid casualties and increase the confidence of victory, will be the Varyag Chinese naval and air and missile forces "sword grindstone." At present, the Chinese navy is a need such a "grindstone" and a formal traditional carriers, carrier trials in China's future before the tranquility of this measure is sufficient, and not as blindly as the legendary tradition of the construction of 5-6 ships aircraft carrier, it would be self-defeating.
Thirdly, I hope from now immediately put into 'the future aircraft carrier' of the research and development. The first one is still to be resolved without issue, the basic operational design parameters are: nuclear power; maximum potential depth of 100 meters; maximum speed of 30 knots underwater, surface 40; noise, 150-160 dB; water exposed part of the implementation of the stealth design; double Road length of 240 meters of the main deck, with a total width of 60-65 meters; carry 20 F-11C, 4 anti-submarine helicopters can lift the periscope, the navigation command and fire control radar tower to extend the maximum length of 120 meters, 32 to the vertical water emission range of 600 km above the sea, land attack missiles (which can carry nuclear warheads), 288 could be underwater near the distal vertical launch air defense missiles, torpedoes and anti-submarine missile number. Will enlarge the future design of technology is mature and can take off or carry large planes and more tactical and strategic weapons in ocean-going operations. Combined with the innovative spirit of our future generation of heavy 4-F, and the excellent 095 and 096, do not own that dominate the world, the results of our efforts will be made by someone else's mouth, a fair evaluation, never say goodbye 'obscenity' of the era.
Fourth, the CPC Central Committee in good faith asked: Do not be conventional aircraft carrier in the United States on the speculation (especially "No Bush" aircraft carrier) fascinated attention. Americans are characterized by: the more the more their whitewash and cover up weaknesses. Certainly fall into the trap of their own when the opponents are trying to pull into it. Cool analysis not fooled. Finally, we asked the technology elite, do not have to follow the others behave, do not underestimate the country's current leading cadres of insight and coordination, convinced that some of the previous experience than you, but not necessarily smarter than you, have a laugh Finally, confidence.
I hope the Chinese military is a traditional carrier's demise; I also hope that China is the future of new scientific and technological personnel carrier aircraft carrier and the founder and creator of the great!
American aircraft carriers in China really need it? I do like the U.S. Nimitz-class 'this backward' traditional carrier China is not required. Lake in the whole country favorable for the traditional military aircraft of the moment, I am sure that will usher in condemning a: Shut up! The carrier you useless idiot. But how many people see clearly whether the traditional model of the aircraft carrier for China's real military reform and the world's future? I think the traditional generation of aircraft carriers at sea, as close to the end of the era of King, even if just launched the latest version of the United States near Nimitz-class aircraft carrier (Bush) is also not change the fact that coming. Today the rapid development in science and technology, ultra long-range, air and space integration of precision guided weapons with each passing day, the traditional carriers as fully exposed sea monster who is about to come true on the aircraft carrier Khrushchev predicted: the sea live coffin. If the Chinese do not have at this moment forward it to follow the trend blindly, ignoring the conditions in pursuit of untimely "military fashion", then the Chinese people will go 'blue' on the road same mistake again, will be in the future The 30-year best time for China's rise in missed opportunities. In the past 80 years, China has missed the era of the traditional carriers, if in this era coming to an end the moment we'll like 'Kua Fu' sunset that will follow in the coming era, when the aircraft carrier was caught off guard and unable to.
Aircraft carrier battle command of the sea is indeed on the distant continent to implement military weapon against the firm, its operational effectiveness is currently no substitute for any other weapons, but no doubt that the invisibility of the traditional carriers too bad in the next war will be very vulnerable to a fatal blow, so it is difficult to achieve carrier's own combat missions. Aircraft carrier construction difficult, complex configuration, maintenance, expensive, non-ordinary strength can have, is that it has become a symbol of the powerful and the wealthy. Legend of China's DF-25 and DF-21C conventional carrier will become the killer, regardless of the actual situation at least from the theory in doubt, we do not know exactly how the experimental results, I think that there is no need to wait for the implementation of naval warfare in the future 'one hit kill' time declared end of an era of traditional carriers. We must now think of is: Chinese people can do the Americans do not understand that? Japan, Germany can not think of such a naval veteran of it? Britain, France and other traditional maritime powers which should be most clearly the weaknesses of traditional carriers, I think they had a rainy day in silence.
China needs a strong navy, but also a strong need for our aircraft carrier fleet to defend the future economic development, but we must take the 'good steel used in the cutting edge', we have to concentrate manpower, material and financial resources to the development of future new aircraft carrier , carrier road with Chinese characteristics, the realization of China's aircraft carrier 'leapfrog' development.
Stealth and can dive is the only way to develop future aircraft carrier, China should the whole nation in this area of research and development force immediately, some people will laugh at me: the traditional carriers are not even water, that you have experience in the development of this future aircraft carrier wow! Nonsense! In fact, we did not make sense of this ridicule, because human history has proved: many national development process is not a continuous succession of careful and gradual process of the development process, all good people has one or more leaps and bounds sub-process, another example: the black African world they do not make a greater contribution to technological development, but they can learn to use modern technology, through an understanding of other races can do the work of the same complex, and even the President, you to discrimination can therefore said to them: you do not have the four great inventions and how to use a computer programmed it? Almost all advanced thinking across the nation have the capability of the Chinese nation is definitely one of the world's best nation, we should and must have such a leap of thinking.
Traditional aircraft carrier of the future may only be the only place that inheritable 'flight deck of the application of technology', China's submarine technology is not far down the West, and I personally think that has been close to, which is China's R & D the future aircraft carrier to lay a solid technical reserves, together with our modern destroyers and patrol boats to stealth design of practical experience I assert that: China has the ability to design a new type of aircraft used in combat and can rapidly.
To put it plainly: the future aircraft carrier is a carrier-based aircraft and missiles built a large submarine, although it does not need modern deep submergence submarine tactics, high-mute, but by a simple dive depth of 100 meters and the surface of the tactical action Stealth the weakness put the traditional command of the aircraft carrier away, so that the long-range cruise missiles and precision-guided weapons, ballistic missiles have lost direction and goals, and coordination, command and tactical submarines, cruisers, destroyers and frigates with its own aircraft carrier and missiles (cruise, ballistic and anti-aircraft missiles) against the enemy launched a fierce sea or land targets hit, air and sea battle, the aircraft carrier itself to play vividly irreplaceable combat effectiveness. Now we have lost and should not be lost to waste on things that our youth should be brainstorming, reuse the younger generation, to the Chinese scientific and technological personnel in the most generous support and patience, not fear of failure and courage to explore. Both absorbing Western technology and experience can get rid of the inherent confinement of Western thinking. Also, I think: The booster mode carrier-based aircraft we can try to take off, rocket technology is our strength, why do we always look at people's 'slip hop and catapult' it? Rocket boosters used on-board fuel tank I see better than use, it can even be the future of carrier-based aircraft carrier directly to the combat zone, but also greatly shorten the takeoff run distance. Use of hybrid (ie, rocket engines and aircraft engine combination) of the carrier-based aircraft will bring more convenience to the Chinese navy, fast and flexible. Step further, if the Chinese can this new load carrier aircraft rocket engine rocket vector technology (similar to satellite orbit rocket engine technology), then China's future carrier-based aircraft also can take off and land vertically. That would be how strong we can imagine! My scientific and technical personnel in China are very confident in the future aircraft carrier research and development will be able to go its own way. The key now we have to get wise and great leader support. Having said that I still have to increase a few wordy, and that is: Do not invest in more traditional carrier up and down, taking 80% of the energy used in the development of future new aircraft carrier, the deck technology can land on the simulation and training will 80% of control level of real combat. China's current situation is not suitable for large-scale construction of conventional aircraft carrier.
First, we have not for the aircraft carrier fleet maneuvers out of display space, so we need to give priority to quickly recover Taiwan, and clean up the South China Sea. These campaigns do not require traditional carrier, China's Second Artillery Corps, Navy and Air Force together with enough strength to see the leader of the operation and determination. Their territories brave victory, the Central should the death in breaking the enemy's determination to defeat an enemy that means and confidence, then courage to take action if the United States, the momentum has won Guam, firm courage to do a good job preparing for heavy fighting, completely smashed the island chain.
Second, the state should fix 'Varyag' basis, it is necessary to build a 6-7 million tonnes of conventional aircraft carrier the next 12-16 years as the Navy used for monitoring the South China Sea, and has accumulated experience in using technology deck . 'Varyag' can not be used as a naval aircraft carrier the formal, it is for me the current value of the missile, and naval and air force as a "sink the aircraft carrier" of the target ship training, special training of our army in the present complex conditions of war training in how to destroy aircraft carrier ship (of course, necessary to combat training with live ammunition, bombs can coach.), in the Varyag to be installed on a dynamic and informal, or test the radar and anti-missile weapons, anti-submarine and electromagnetic, electronic jamming system to complete the simulation of real naval aircraft carrier status, to temper our efforts to combat and overcome all kinds of weapons, aircraft carriers, make full preparations for the win, which is Varyag turning waste into the core values. On the Varyag is necessary to train our pilots, but I think this is only its second level of value, certainly China's future than the deck of aircraft carrier Varyag more advanced, it can not completely rely on Varyag to train our pilots. Through these efforts, on the surface we are a luxury, but the actual recovery of Taiwan it for us to clean up the South China Sea, smashed the island chain to save a lot of money to improve the combat level, to avoid casualties and increase the confidence of victory, will be the Varyag Chinese naval and air and missile forces "sword grindstone." At present, the Chinese navy is a need such a "grindstone" and a formal traditional carriers, carrier trials in China's future before the tranquility of this measure is sufficient, and not as blindly as the legendary tradition of the construction of 5-6 ships aircraft carrier, it would be self-defeating.
Thirdly, I hope from now immediately put into 'the future aircraft carrier' of the research and development. The first one is still to be resolved without issue, the basic operational design parameters are: nuclear power; maximum potential depth of 100 meters; maximum speed of 30 knots underwater, surface 40; noise, 150-160 dB; water exposed part of the implementation of the stealth design; double Road length of 240 meters of the main deck, with a total width of 60-65 meters; carry 20 F-11C, 4 anti-submarine helicopters can lift the periscope, the navigation command and fire control radar tower to extend the maximum length of 120 meters, 32 to the vertical water emission range of 600 km above the sea, land attack missiles (which can carry nuclear warheads), 288 could be underwater near the distal vertical launch air defense missiles, torpedoes and anti-submarine missile number. Will enlarge the future design of technology is mature and can take off or carry large planes and more tactical and strategic weapons in ocean-going operations. Combined with the innovative spirit of our future generation of heavy 4-F, and the excellent 095 and 096, do not own that dominate the world, the results of our efforts will be made by someone else's mouth, a fair evaluation, never say goodbye 'obscenity' of the era.
Fourth, the CPC Central Committee in good faith asked: Do not be conventional aircraft carrier in the United States on the speculation (especially "No Bush" aircraft carrier) fascinated attention. Americans are characterized by: the more the more their whitewash and cover up weaknesses. Certainly fall into the trap of their own when the opponents are trying to pull into it. Cool analysis not fooled. Finally, we asked the technology elite, do not have to follow the others behave, do not underestimate the country's current leading cadres of insight and coordination, convinced that some of the previous experience than you, but not necessarily smarter than you, have a laugh Finally, confidence.
I hope the Chinese military is a traditional carrier's demise; I also hope that China is the future of new scientific and technological personnel carrier aircraft carrier and the founder and creator of the great!
我要评论
最新评论- 暂无已审核评论!