8 February, the Pentagon released by the U.S. Joint Chiefs of Staff Chairman Mike. Mullen, the U.S. team authored new version of "National Military Strategy Report", the report is the second since the 2003 Iraq war, the first large-scale changes. The central highlight: In the future, the U.S. will end in Iraq, Afghanistan, posing as the "war on terror", the eastward shift of U.S. strategic center of the trend is irreversible, in the next 10 - 20 years, dealing with China in politics , the rise of the military level, has become the top priority of U.S. national security strategy.

No doubt, the top U.S. military and political view, the mere bin Laden has been unable to shake the U.S. "security interests", the confrontation with the national level and the contest is a real threat facing the United States and challenges. Elite opinion in the United States, the Asia-Pacific region has become a matter of U.S. national interests and priorities at the heart of the United States must remain the absolute influence of the Asia Pacific region, to contain any opponents or potential opponents challenge that the United States must spare no effort Asia-Pacific region to strengthen its allies in the "close relationship" to strengthen the Union's sphere of influence.

In this regard, we must have a clear enough understanding. Indeed, with China's strategy at the national level rise at the same time, the United States is still not out of the post-crisis era, and, in the short term do not see any sign of a strong rebound. In Southeast Asia, everyone shouted back to the South China Sea high, but here we can easily find how many countries could make the United States willing to contain and encircle China's pawn?

Cong our traditional perspective of geo-political considerations, we can analyze it, the U.S. military to strengthen its allies, political cooperation Shui how deep in the end.

First, in the South China Sea affairs, Vietnam, Australia will be the key to win over the United States. Philippines, Indonesia, Malaysia and other countries because of its limited strength, especially in market share, all areas of investment, China relies too deep, and he was "beside the giant," they meant only a few in the side of the uproar, no strategy to contain any substantive actions, therefore, the U.S. will not be placed too high hopes. But Vietnam is different in the whole of ASEAN, Vietnam's most powerful military strength, especially in its China strategy, Vietnam is eager to curb our use of the U.S. psychological, on many issues, the United States and Vietnam have hit it off. Although the impact of the Vietnam War, both sides being substantially difficult to form military alliance, but its military technical cooperation, military equipment, lifting of the ban is an inevitable thing. In particular, the United States has long coveted for the Cam Ranh Bay, Vietnam is well aware.

It can be said to be accounted for in the recovery of the Nansha Islands area, the more the risk of military conflict, the more both parties will make peace with the United States become more and more uncontrollable.

Australia. Among the traditional image in people, Australia seems to us quite far. How not Rio Tinto case, not Rudd, it is difficult that we will study in Australia as the opponent, or that we should be friends. However, as has always been to the United States followed the lead of Australia, whether in Iraq or Afghanistan, is one of the countries most involved. It has a powerful naval and air combat, throughout Southeast Asia and even the South Pacific, second to none. The former Prime Minister Kevin Rudd is intervened to resolve the South China Sea issue China's most staunch supporters. US-Australia alliance trend of iron interests of national security as the cornerstone of Australia and Australia must actively involved in the decision-US security sphere of interest, which is we should pay special attention.

Second, India. From our energy lifeline of the security situation in view, India has always cut off the blood vessels of the great advantages of energy. Although we can have enough strength to solve the problem in southern Tibet, but the Indian side of the sea and air forces that can in the sea channel for the manufacture of our energy disaster. In our Navy and Air Force long-range delivery capability seriously inadequate, hasty hands on India will be a huge risk. In fact, this is the protracted Sino-Indian border issue crux. Not long ago, with the first flight of the F -20, the U.S. position will import a large number of advanced military technology in India, US-Indian military aircraft manufacturing, technology, and many other civilian and strengthen cooperation, Peugeot US cooperation in Indian country ahead of the arrival of the honeymoon period.

Third, Japan. United States believes some countries are developing "anti-intervention" and regional Fengsuo capacity and limit the U.S. freedom of action in the ability of the international community, therefore, the United States and Japan Self-Defense Force is bound to strengthen the cooperation of "raising its overseas combat capability". The war in Iraq in 2003, Japan's Self-Defense Forces to go abroad for the first time, "driving self-defense rights." So, we must pay attention, for the vital security interests of China, Japan actually be involved in those "foreign"?

The first is the Taiwan Strait. Unification concerns U.S. national interests, but his influence for the United States, only a partial retreat, I adjust the pace of the U.S. strategy is necessary among the acceptable price. However, for the case of Japan, it is a disaster. As a resource-poor island nation, dependent on the marine is the lifeline of Japan's deadly lies. Taiwan's return means that the lifeblood of the Japanese Department of State Development and China's hands. This is the Japanese long-term pursuit of absolute control in terms of air and sea is unacceptable. From the Diaoyu Islands to Dokdo, the South Kuril Islands, the island is not difficult to understand on the issue of Japanese people nervous. Once war broke out the next uniform, the intensity of the war the Japanese intervention, the depth and breadth are unprecedented. For the Japanese, even if the state pushed to the brink of destruction, is an acceptable gamble. The problem is that we have the determination to destroy Japan? ? ? ? ! ! !

Followed by North Korea. North Korea is Japan's choice for the west again. Yin Ping Island shelling, the Japanese Prime Minister Naoto Kan explicit said that Japan consider the deteriorating situation on the Korean peninsula, the implementation of the time to send Self-Defense Forces "evacuation mission." Cheong Wa Dae triggered a strong reaction. It should be said Naoto Kan of the position, but the Japanese term for the inevitable result. North Korean nuclear issue, the Japanese have been very excited about the Japanese side of the preparation work is also productive. To be sure, once the second Korean war broke out, the Japanese Imperial Army will be the name of "evacuation", "humanitarian aid" stir up trouble on behalf of the Korean Peninsula, Japanese militarism will be totally meaningless reincarnated!

Clausewitz: "You want peace? Well, from now on, you begin to prepare for war now!"

You want peace? So, you have to make our country and nation to become a true rival to any enemy!