网站管理 辽ICP备10006314号 
Since the 90s of last century, the market economy, people's pursuit of profit, giving China's coastal islands, particularly islands and surrounding non-resident has brought disaster to the marine ecology, marine resources at stake.
Based on the data, "Liaoning Province, an island lost 48 to reduce the number of the island accounted for 18% of the total; Hebei Province, an island lost 60, a decrease of 46%; Fujian Province, an island lost 83, a decrease of 6%; Hainan Island disappeared 51, decreased by 22%. "
To this end, since 2003, the island protection law be drafted. December 26, 2009, "Island Protection Act" passed. March 1, 2010, "Island Protection Act" into effect. The law came just in time.
Initially, the Japanese on China law, and no more reaction.
Unexpectedly, three months later, the "Island Protection Act" has been implemented for half a month's time, the Japanese began to stress this to protect China's maritime rights and interests since, resources, and ecological laws.
According to Japan's Kyodo News reported:
"Katsuya Okada, the Japanese foreign minister on the 16th on China's implementation of the" Law on Protection Island, "has expressed the hope that China will not use this as the basis to interfere in the Senkaku islands, also called the Diaoyu Islands in China's territorial problems."
China, a law to protect marine resources, why does the tension caused by the Japanese?
Katsuya Okada from Japan's Foreign Minister's statement at a press conference of view, the reason why the Japanese strained the law, because it is worried that mainland China pursuant to the Act, together with Taiwan to recover sovereignty over the Diaoyu Islands and surrounding waters.
Why, then, last December 26, the National People's Congress to vote on the adoption of this law, did not see the Japanese react?
This is from the "island Protection Act" provisions talking about. I specifically downloaded the full text of the law conscientiously read several times and found that the law does not a word about "Diaoyu Islands" is used to children, and that the law does not involve the sovereignty of the island's international dispute resolution issues, involves only the ownership of islands, marine types of ownership, the legal use of island resources and other issues.
It seems that the Japanese at this time since the sudden tension in the law, is likely to be observed to the mainland was called pursuant to the law, the Diaoyu Islands between China and Japan to resolve the issue of sovereignty. Then, after careful study of the Japanese law, it may find the law to resolve the Diaoyu Islands sovereignty issue hidden password. As a result, the Japanese foreign minister reiterated that the so-called "Senkaku islands," the sovereignty, and to express hard-line stance, in order to calm public opinion in the heart of Japan.
Katsuya Okada, the Japanese foreign minister on the Diaoyu Islands sovereignty of the statement is contrary to the logic of historical truth and reality, will inevitably meet with the Chinese across the Taiwan Strait and around the world opposed. In ancient times, this problem is very simple, who fist hard on who should. Era of peace in the 21st century, this issue is very complex, both China and Japan are basically speaking the same language. I hope that the Diaoyu Islands in this sensitive issue between China and Japan as soon as possible a peaceful and rational solution.
我要评论
最新评论- 暂无已审核评论!